Clark County logo   Clark County Washington title  
Links to finding county services
Search the Web site
Clark County home page A to Z index Find it Links to other sites News releases Contact us Link to jobs
Community Planning
2016 Comprehensive Growth Management Plan Update
Meeting information
Process and documents
Get involved
Options and impacts
Common questions
Reference documents
Contact us


Transportation planning

2016 Comprehensive Growth Management Plan update

Options and impacts

October 2014

Three alternatives represent the range of options currently being considered for the distribution of population, employment and development in the County over the next 20 years (2015-2035). The impacts of these alternatives will be studied and compared during the environmental review process required under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).

In August, Clark County held Scoping open houses for the environmental review process. Information was presented on potential alternatives for the comprehensive plan update. With the feedback received in response to the Scoping open houses, there is now detailed information available on the alternatives.

Alternative 1: No action. The county adopts the map as it is with no new changes.

Alternative 2: Rural and Urban Changes. The new planning assumptions, policy direction, changes in land use/zoning, and principles and values defined by the commissioners were used in this alternative. This option supports job and population growth, acknowledges development trends and cleans up map inconsistencies.

Alternative 3: Battle Ground and La Center. The cities of Battle Ground and La Center are considering expanding their urban growth areas to support job growth.

Additional information:


Comments must be received by 5 p.m. Nov. 18 to be considered in the environmental analysis. There will be an additional comment period for the supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) when it's released in early 2015.


The county will prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) in compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The SEIS will address the environmental impacts anticipated under each of the proposed growth alternatives.

There will be a comment period for the supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) early in 2015.

To stay up to date on the progress of the project and comment periods, sign up to receive e-mail notifications.


August 2014
Environmental Impact Statement ~ Scoping Open Houses

Clark County received input on the possible scope of the supplemental environmental impact statement (EIS). The scope is the range and types of issues to be studied for the EIS. The comment period for the scoping process ran from July 30-September 1, 2014. However, comments on the comprehensive plan in general can be submitted up until the plan is adopted in June 2016.

Four open houses were held to provide the public with opportunities to comment on the scope of the three suggested land use and growth alternatives to study under SEPA. Participants had the opportunity to learn about the three suggested alternatives and provide comments.

A Scoping Report which provides information on the comments received from the public has been completed. Please see the report below.

Information and materials presented at the open houses:

2016 Comprehensive Plan update SEPA process

Because growth in Clark County had lagged since the growth plan was last updated in 2007, the county intends to rely on the final environmental impact statement written for that update. However, the county will supplement that final EIS with new environmental analysis, as needed.

When the EIS of the newest suggested alternatives is completed, it will be sent to the Board of Clark County Commissioners, which will select one alternative in spring 2015. The chosen alternative then will undergo an even deeper analysis, which will result in a final environmental impact statement.

What is SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act)?

SEPA, enacted in 1984, requires local jurisdictions to evaluate potential environmental impacts of actions they approve or undertake. The most common evaluation looks at potential environmental impacts of a proposed project, such as a big box store, or a large non-project action, such as adoption of a new urban growth boundary. A SEPA checklist prescribes elements to be evaluated, and the completed checklist is shared with federal, state and local agencies, tribes, neighborhood organizations and interested residents. People can comment on the alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts or other relevant topics.



Related information
Public meetings and more
  • No upcoming meetings scheduled at this time
Find it

Having trouble finding what you are looking for?

  • A-Z index - All services and programs are listed.
  • Contact us on the phone during business hours or by email any time.